A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours more than the development of a wall in a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide consideration pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children home at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of organizing breaches, environmental issues, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a really publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building is effective at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek out to construct their relatives household. The situation is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their future neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their arranging permission by creating a wall past the boundaries of their web site, leading to an encroachment with a Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as a result spots are topic to rigid controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, notably in a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly built, is in the correct posture. Their lawful staff has characterised the action being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their watch, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal setting up disputes, the place sights of The ocean are both of those extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-large water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, a picture which has because come to be emblematic in the intensity of your dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to Assemble Visible proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Occasions documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these kinds of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a region influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were covered in detail via the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read even more submissions on whether or not interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important minute inside the lawful timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as created, goes beyond what was accepted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his examination of scheduling documents, maps, and situations hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have got explained their lengthy-standing link to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few simply trying to produce a relatives dwelling in accordance Using the law. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Exclusive Space of Conservation and say that all will work are already performed depending on Qualified information and permitted programs. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, usually do not change the fundamental facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for just a scenario that many observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier noted which the businessman had Earlier been involved with local advocacy on organizing and environmental troubles, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty different Skilled backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-higher h2o through a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-significant water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both of those the Actual physical truth of your coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
As the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human aspect remains central: neighbours who ought to live along with each other long after the authorized costs happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction will work at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the situation increase further than that deal with. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems such as environmental defense and assets legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a location of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of your dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized concerns. Irrespective of whether it can ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s results. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to Paul Feely and Rene Collier seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent times.